← Blog

Do You Need a Head of Marketing? A Two-Question Test for SaaS Founders

Most founders asking if they need marketing help are asking two questions at once. A two-question test to tell which role – if any – you need.

By , B2B SaaS Growth Leader & Advisor

You've set budget aside for a marketing hire. The job ad is half-written.

Something about it feels off.

It should. Most founders asking themselves whether they need help with marketing are asking two questions at once: are there decisions nobody has made, and is there work nobody has time for? Those have different answers – and only one of them is a full-time Head of Marketing.

Two questions, four possible answers. One of them is "nobody yet."

What does a Head of Marketing do at a SaaS company under €5M ARR?

Verdict: two jobs – decide, then run. The job ads list fifteen responsibilities. They collapse into these two.

The deciding job is three calls: who you sell to (and who you turn away), how those customers buy – on their own, through the product, or through a salesperson – and which number marketing is judged on. Every channel, budget line and hire downstream depends on them.

The running job is building and feeding the channels that serve the motion you picked. For a self-serve product, that's search and AI-search content, comparison pages, onboarding and upgrade emails. For a sales-led one, it's target account lists, LinkedIn, events and the content sales sends after a call. Add the site and the CRM hygiene nobody wants to own. Every week, indefinitely. Unglamorous? Yes. Also where most of the results come from.

The decisions pick the channels – not the other way around. Most founders start with channels (a few LinkedIn posts, some paid, a blog) and then wonder why nothing adds up.

At a 2,000-person company the two jobs belong to different people. At a 15-person SaaS, the founder is hoping one hire covers both. Sometimes that's right. Often it means paying full-time for a part-time problem – or putting someone hired to execute in front of a question they can't answer alone.

Is your marketing problem a decision or a workload?

Verdict: list what's stuck and sort each item. "We don't know X" is a decision. "We know X works and nobody has time" is workload.

Is it a decision or a workload? It's a decision if you can't name your ideal customer in one line, self-serve vs sales-led is still an argument, or nobody can say which number marketing is judged on – that needs senior judgment. It's workload if one channel already brings in customers and it's starved, you know what to ship next, or you keep saying no to things that would work – that needs hours.

If you can't name the ideal customer, the motion or the number, it's a decision. If a channel already works and nobody has time to run more of it, it's workload.

The order matters. In every company I've worked in, redefining the ideal customer was the first and most leveraged job – and it had to be pushed through product and sales, not only marketing. The metrics come next, because they follow the motion. A sales-led company judges marketing on meetings booked and pipeline. A product-led one judges it on trial → activation → paid. Pick the motion and the team you need becomes obvious. Skip it, and every job description you write is a guess.

How does the two-question test work?

Verdict: answer two yes/no questions and you land in one of four boxes – each points to a different role, or to no hire at all.

Answer these two honestly:

  1. Are your big go-to-market decisions made and written down? Ideal customer, motion, the number.
  2. Is there more proven marketing work than you can run yourself?

The two-question test. Decisions made and workload light: no one yet. Decisions made and workload heavy: a full-time marketer. Decisions open and workload light: a fractional Head of Marketing. Decisions open and workload heavy: a full-time Head of Marketing.

Decisions made, workload light: no one yet

Verdict: keep doing it yourself and revisit every quarter.

You know who you sell to and how they buy, and the work fits in your week. A hire here inherits a to-do list a freelancer could handle. Spend the salary on the product, and re-run the test when the backlog starts growing.

Decisions made, workload heavy: a full-time marketer

Verdict: hire for execution inside the motion you've chosen – and title it honestly.

This is the classic first marketing hire, and it's usually a manager, not a Head. A self-serve product needs someone who lives in onboarding emails and comparison content. A sales-led one needs someone sales will take lists from. The readiness test in our guide to hiring your first marketer tells you whether you're there yet.

Decisions open, workload light: a fractional Head of Marketing

Verdict: you need senior judgment for weeks, not a senior salary for years.

The questions are hard, but they don't take 40 hours a week. A fractional Head of Marketing settles the motion and the ideal customer with you, builds the first version of the channels that feed it, and leaves the decisions written down – which is exactly what your first full-time hire will need on day one. Here's what a fractional CMO does for a SaaS company, and what it costs.

Decisions open, workload heavy: a full-time Head of Marketing

Verdict: hire a player-coach – someone senior who still does the work.

This is where the full-time senior hire earns its cost. Jason Lemkin's advice at SaaStr fits this quadrant well: "Hire a true stretch VP that has owned a number" (SaaStr). One condition: make the decisions with them in the first month, explicitly, and write them down. Otherwise they spend their first quarter discovering that nobody has.

Why does hiring a Head of Marketing before the decisions are made go wrong?

Verdict: the hire inherits a question instead of a job – and gets judged on a number nobody chose.

Picture a devtools company at around €2M ARR. Developers love the product. Most revenue comes from self-serve, but a handful of large accounts came in through the founder's network, and the board wants more of those. The founder hires a senior Head of Marketing to "own growth."

Month one. She finds two motions running side by side – self-serve trials and a sales pipeline – with no rule for which account goes where. Product wants less friction at signup. Sales wants a demo form in front of it.

Month three. She has a plan for each motion and no authority to pick one. Choosing means changing the pricing page, the sales comp plan and the roadmap. Those belong to the founder, the head of sales and the CTO.

Month six. She's measured on a pipeline target set before anyone agreed where pipeline was supposed to come from. The work is good. The number is red. Everyone is frustrated, and nobody did anything wrong.

A marketer can run the experiments and recommend a motion. Only the people who own product, pricing and sales can commit the company to it.

The cost is time you don't get back. Carta's data on more than 185,000 equity-holding employees at VC-backed companies puts median startup tenure at 2.0 years (Carta). If your Head of Marketing's first year goes to settling a question leadership could have settled before the hire, you've spent half of a typical startup tenure on work that wasn't the job.

When is a full-time Head of Marketing the right call?

Verdict: when you have both problems – or when the decisions are made and you need someone senior in the room every day.

  • Both problems at once. Open decisions and a heavy backlog. A fractional leader becomes the bottleneck here.
  • Sales needs a daily counterpart. Pipeline reviews, lead routing disputes, campaign handoffs that can't wait a week.
  • You want one person to own the strategy for years. Settling the decisions is a project. Owning them is a job.

Plenty of founders hire full-time anyway, and some of them are right to. If that's you, do one thing first: write down the ideal customer, the motion and the number before the first interview. Then your hire inherits a job instead of a question.

FAQ

What's the difference between a Head of Marketing and a marketing manager?

A Head of Marketing makes the go-to-market decisions and owns the number. A marketing manager runs the plan inside decisions someone else made. Hiring a manager into open decisions is the most common version of the mistake above.

Should my first senior marketing hire be a Head of Marketing or a CMO?

Head of Marketing. At a 15-person company, a CMO title is inflation, and it fools no one – not candidates, not investors. In a company that needs one, a CMO manages directors and senior managers who each run their own function. That's a different skill set from building the first version yourself, and most founder-led SaaS companies are years away from needing it.

Can the founder be the Head of Marketing?

For the decisions, often yes – founders usually know the customer best, and the ideal-customer call should go through them anyway. For the workload, not for long. The founder's week runs out first.

What does a fractional Head of Marketing do?

Makes the go-to-market decisions with you, builds the first version of the channels, and hands over what a full-time hire needs. More on how a fractional CMO works with SaaS founders.

Where to start on Monday

Write three sentences: "Our ideal customer is…", "They buy by…", "Marketing is judged on…". If you can finish all three and the work is piling up, you need a marketer. If you can't finish one of them, you need the decision before you need the hire.

None of this makes the decisions easier. The test only tells you who should be in the room while you make them.

If you land in the "decisions open" box: that's the work I do – the job of your first Head of Marketing, for founders who aren't ready to hire one. Here's how I work as a fractional CMO. And if you'd rather compare notes on your three sentences first, I'm happy to read them.